Otter - 02 July 2008 11:19 AM
<snip>
I just don’t see any reason to be trying to organize a boycott.
<snip>
Otter,
I’m the one who originally suggested the boycott.
It was in response to the proposition to get the townships and boroughs involved, which is unnecessary and useless.
I have no problems with the sale of a legal product. However, there are some in the community who have concerns. If enough members of the community are concerned enough to take action, it would be in the best interests of the business owner to address the communites concerns.
Will it have an actual effect on drug use? Not a chance.
Like it or not, did Wal-Mart in Shrewsbury stop selling rifles and shotguns because rifles and shotguns are now illegal, or that they were losing money on the sales. No, it was due to outside (market) pressure.
At the risk of making a straw man argument, let’s assume that “the local chain pharmacy” (without naming names) decided to sell adult sexual aids shaped like part of the male anatomy and displayed them prominently at the entrance to the store. Again, a legal product. However, I’m sure that some, maybe many, would not appreciate the display. Many would choose not to patronize the store. Even if this were not organized, it would still be a boycott. If “the local chain pharmacy” loses business due to the display, it can choose to remove the display, or continue to lose business. However, someone needs to tell management why they will no longer be patronizing.