I would be interested in knowing why redistricting was not considered to be the first option. It certainly would be more cost effective? I suppose that it could be because the board and administrators did not want to deal with all of the angry parents who did not want their children moved to a different elementary school out of the community in which they live (yes this argument has been made by parents at least twice that I can remember when the idea of redistricting was mentioned).
But............with the solution proposed (moving 4th grade to SEMS West) doesn’t that bring about the same end result?
These children WILL go to school out of the community in which they live AND be in attendance with older students. Do not for a moment believe that the older students have no influence over the younger ones. I believe one of the elementary schools in SESD has already experienced problems this year because elementary students ride the buses with middle school students.
Or is this entire issue more about redirecting curriculum than it is about over crowded classrooms?
Should there be a short-term, band aide solution or a long-term permanent solution?
What IS in the best interest of the students?
How can the student’s have a top-notch learning environment where they can realize what a privilege (not an entitlement) a public education is without picking the last penny from the pockets of the tax payers?
I am thinking out loud. Some of the best solutions come into view when we don’t presume to already have all of the answers.
I am off to think some more.