6 of 6
6
PROPOSED PIG FARM - CONTINUED
Posted: 28 October 2004 10:50 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 76 ]
Moderator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  989
Joined  2004-12-15

To all regarding the ad in the paper…

Some of you mentioned that you saw an ad for a hog manager for Country View in Southern York County. The farm was Green Valley Farm.

No need to panic! Green Valley Farm is in Seven Valleys. It is corporate owned CAFO not related to John Marsteller’s Green Valley Farms (notice the difference in Farm vs. Farms).

This particular farm though is a good example of what is wrong with the industry. This operation was originally run by a small farmer. He screwed up several times, dumped manure wherever he felt like it and did not take care of his operation. This was a start to finish place with breeding, sow operations and eventually finishers. It is quite large. They have had numerous spills as well.

Several years ago, Country View stepped in and bought out the farm. They now run it. The irony of this is that Team Ag designed the farm… then Country View hired people from Team Ag to run it. The trail of paper left behind is quite long. I found it while doing research at DEP looking for violations.

This is a good example of everything that is wrong with this industry. The last major spill they had was caused by a worker’s sweatshirt falling into the pit and eventually getting caught in a drain pipe. Lovely.

Hope to see you all in a few days.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 October 2004 10:52 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 77 ]
Moderator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  989
Joined  2004-12-15

In regards to the editorial posted in the YDR today I submitted the following reply. We will see how bad they butcher it if they post it…

In response to Erin Miller from Felton, I submit the following thoughts:

You say the Marstellers should have the right to do with their land as they please. Right to Farm protection seems to give them that right. Unlike the farmer, I can’t have a toxic waste dump, abandoned cars or farm animals on my land. The township and state prevent that.

You mention that most of the opposition is not native to the area. You might be right, but Mr. Marsteller invited over 40 of those families to be his neighbors by selling lots to them. He is not alone in that practice. We all pay for his ag preservation subsidy also. By the way, I am a native of this township.

As for prices not changing since the 50’s, you need to look hard at government subsidies and price fixing. Also, big corporations are controlling your market. Blame them for the flat prices. They are creating artificial demand for cheaper products. They improve their process, reduce their costs, but rarely pass that along to the farmer.

Do you honestly think a big corporation has any concern for any farmer? What happens when they drop the contract due to demand declines or when they take their business overseas? It has happened all over the country before. As the farmer, you are stuck with an expensive storage barn.

Bear in mind that the opposition has been working hard to find alternatives. Not one farmer has shown any interest in sustainable ag options. Thinking outside your front yard goes both ways. These are tried and true options with success stories around the country.

Yes, farmers do work hard. I admire that and support those that take care of the land and show respect for what they have been blessed with.

************
Original from today’s paper…

Can’t stand smell? Move away
Thursday, October 28, 2004

I am writing in response to the immense outcry by Southern York County residents against the proposed hog farming operation. There are so many reasons that the Marstellers should be able to have their hog farming operation, I can’t name them all here.

To start, the Marstellers own their land, and have for quite some time. They should have the right to do with their land as they please. Would you want the township to come in and tell you that you couldn’t do something on your land? I doubt it.

Next, hog farming operations are necessities. When all of those opposed are willing to pay $20 or $25 for a pork chop, I will agree with their position. Farmers put in hog farms because they get paid so poorly for their crops. The prices farmers are paid for crops has not increased substantially since the late 1950s.

Last, those opposed to the hog farm, most not native to the area, should realize that they moved into an area which has always been agricultural. My guess is that most of those opposed moved here just for that reason. Farms smell, period. If you want to live next to a farm, you’d better get used to the smell. If you don’t like it, go back to wherever you came from.

As the wife of a farmer, I would like to tell all those opposed to think outside of their front yards for a change. Farmers work hard for their living so that all of you can eat, and you should keep that in mind the next time you go to the grocery store.

ERIN J. MILLER
FELTON

Profile
 
 
Posted: 29 October 2004 01:29 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 78 ]
Immediate Family
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  529
Joined  2004-12-15

To all regarding the ad in the paper…

Some of you mentioned that you saw an ad for a hog manager for Country View in Southern York County. The farm was Green Valley Farm.

I happened to look the farm up in the phone book and it is listed as Green Valley Farms… yes with an “s.” This has caused confusion even amongst county employees because the proposed hog farm operation and the Jefferson township location happen to have the same fictional name. The only difference I can see as far as the phone book goes is the Jefferson township one is listed in the phone book while the other is not.

No need to panic! Green Valley Farm is in Seven Valleys. It is corporate owned CAFO not related to John Marsteller’s Green Valley Farms (notice the difference in Farm vs. Farms).

Sorry there is no difference in the name. True both farms are unrelated as far as proprietors go.

When I checked the phone book, the phone number given for the ad is the same one for the location you mention.

This particular farm though is a good example of what is wrong with the industry. This operation was originally run by a small farmer. He screwed up several times, dumped manure wherever he felt like it and did not take care of his operation. This was a start to finish place with breeding, sow operations and eventually finishers. It is quite large. They have had numerous spills as well.

Several years ago, Country View stepped in and bought out the farm. They now run it. The irony of this is that Team Ag designed the farm… then Country View hired people from Team Ag to run it. The trail of paper left behind is quite long. I found it while doing research at DEP looking for violations.

I find it very interesting that County View hired people from Team Ag to run that farm. I guess that’s why they placed the ad in the York Daily Record the other day-- they obviously don’t want Team Ag to run it.

This is a good example of everything that is wrong with this industry. The last major spill they had was caused by a worker’s sweatshirt falling into the pit and eventually getting caught in a drain pipe. Lovely.

Hope to see you all in a few days.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 29 October 2004 06:06 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 79 ]
Moderator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  989
Joined  2004-12-15

To JHH:

At DEP the one farm has the “s”, the other does not (as I mentioned). That is how I found out about Team Ag’s involvement… when I was at DEP doing research, they handed me all the files on Green Vally Farm and Farms. As I was reading through one on the farm in Seven Valleys, I discovered that Team Ag designed the upgrades to the facility. The engineer signed it.

A few months later, the engineer was listed on a contact change form as the person responsible for running the operation. Obviously CVFF had hired the guy from Team Ag to run it. Or they made some arrangement. Either way, it shows the relationship between the firms.

Both CVFF and Team Ag operate out of Ephrata.  Maybe the person the hired previously quit. Who knows… I don’t think it is a reflection on Team Ag. They also expanded the operation considerably. It is pushing over 8000 hogs now I believe.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 29 October 2004 09:19 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 80 ]
Extended Family
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  158
Joined  2004-12-15

Alex

Do you know Country View Farms, Seven Valley, location,
intersecting roads etc?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 November 2004 12:13 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 81 ]
Immediate Family
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  529
Joined  2004-12-15

Condemning the Family Farm
by Thomas Alan Linzey, Esq.

It’s not often that Pennsylvania’s Departments of Agriculture and Environmental Protection are directly contradicted by the federal government – especially on farming issues.

But over the din of the battle to decide whether farm policy in this State will support the livelihoods of independent family farmers or merely continue to line the pockets of agribusiness corporations, that’s exactly what occurred recently.

For the first time in the history of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Ag Census, numbers collected included data concerning the number of hogs raised in Pennsylvania under corporate production contracts. Specifically, the Census numbers compared the percentage of hogs raised by independent family farms with the percentage of hogs now raised under contract to the four agribusiness corporations that control close to 70% of pork production in the United States.

It wasn’t even close.

The USDA survey found that corporate production systems now account for close to 70% of all pork production in Pennsylvania. Thus, “corporate farming” has become the dominant process by which hogs are raised in this State.

Given that all of the hogs in Pennsylvania were once raised by independent family livestock farmers and sold through the open market, the transformation of the face of hog production in this State over the past twenty years is nothing short of startling.

So much for the continuing assertions by the Rendell Administration that “corporate farming” simply isn’t an issue in Pennsylvania.

This “corporatization” of agriculture has worked well for those corporate few in a position to pull it off. First, a handful of agribusiness corporations pioneer the factory farm production system, overloading the market with a glut of cheap meat. Second, resulting basement-level hog prices then undermine independent family livestock farmers struggling to survive. Third, those family farmers then search for an economic lifeline, which the corporation provides in the form of “take it or leave it” factory farm production contracts. Those contracts then control every aspect of hog production and include provisions that enable the corporation to terminate the contract at its discretion while conferring all environmental liability onto the farmer.

Faced with this devil’s choice of “going corporate” or going bankrupt, farm families that want to stay in farming are forced to swallow hard while giving away the farm.

Once-independent family farmers are then not only economically transformed into mere production cogs in a giant machine, they’re actually harnessed to put other independent family farmers out of business.

Welcome to corporate farming.

Contrary to the editorial declarations of Secretary Dennis Wolff of the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture and Secretary Kathleen McGinty of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Governor Ed Rendell’s recently announced “ACRE” Initiative will actually accelerate this process at the expense of still-surviving, independent family hog farmers.

Under the ACRE Initiative, Governor Rendell proposes to create a five member State Board of political appointees – called the Agricultural Review Board - empowered with the authority of a court to strike down local laws that control corporate farming. It would, in essence, place the full power and authority of State government behind a corporate livestock production system, while dooming rural communities to watch as their family farmers and rural communities enter into a now-familiar downward spiral.

If Rendell was serious about protecting family farmers and rural communities, the ACRE Initiative could have been written to explicitly preserve the authority of rural communities to regulate and control corporate farming, while solely empowering the Board to review local laws that unreasonably restrict the operations of independent family farmers.

It wasn’t.

Given the legislature’s track record in passing controversial legislation in the final hours of the legislative session, when most legislators haven’t even read the Bills being pushed on a “fast track” with little debate or discussion, Governor Rendell’s ACRE Initiative may be the holiday gift that just keeps on giving into the years to come.

It’s time to begin making farm policy in Pennsylvania that actually expands and strengthens independent family farmer-based agricultural markets and protects rural communities, rather than catering to agribusiness corporations that ravage our rural communities, eliminate family farmers, and destroy the natural environment.

After all, democracy is supposed to be about protecting the rights of community majorities, not about empowering the corporate few to govern.

It’s time to give Governor Rendell’s Agricultural Review Board the boot it sorely deserves.

Profile
 
 
   
6 of 6
6