DC,
Thanks for the reply and additional information. I would like to respond to several of your comments.
You state that about 75% of the kids who skate need an attitude adjustment. Something to keep in mind is that most municipalities, small or large, deter kids from skateboarding and always have. That being said, skaters are used to being harassed about skateboarding, some even for simply carrying their skateboards down the street. Years of these attitudes have put a bad taste in the skaters mouths about authority. Forced to take their sport to the street, they have given many business owners a bad taste in their mouth after seeing the damage done to curbsides, etc. I’m wondering if you’re really surprised that they pull an attitude at the sign of a badge though? They know what the next words out of your mouth will be. Not bashing you at all DC, but 2 decades of skateboarders have been conditioned to run when they see a badge. They’ve also been conditioned that their exciting sport is looked upon with hatred from government and citizens alike.
You also state that the skaters don’t think to ask permission before skating anywhere. Not sure I understand this, since most every lot in town is posted, who and where would they be asking permission to skate? Again, they know the answer before asking permission. Given that, it’s a decision for them of asking permission and not being allowed to skate, or just skating for a while before getting ran off the property, so they take their chances.
As far as the damage done, I’m with you on this one. However, it is one of the main reasons I think we need to look at giving the skaters somewhere to skate without fear of punishment. Curbs are just concrete, but nobody wants theirs covered with gooey wax or to have one with large chunks missing. Most of the curbs they’ve waxed are in bad locations also, whether it is the bank in the center of town or stewartstown station. Also, I don’t think that the kids necessarily want to skate at the bank or elsewhere, if they had a parking block or two on an empty lot, you would’nt see those curbs being abused ongoing.
Now for the liability issue. I can tell you right now, there was probably a time when this would be a huge factor, but to say this and sue-happiness is the main reason there is no place to skate is outdated at best. There are 100’s of municipalities in the United States similar to ours that have built public skateparks. You will however be hard pressed to find a handful of cases that relate to litigation brought against those facilities or municipalities. Some surprising facts on sports related injuries….
Estimated number of skateboard-related injuries for 1996 in U.S.- 35,788
Estimated number of in-line-related cases that same year- 102,911
Estimated number of roller skating-related cases that same year- 59,450
Estimated number of soccer-related cases that same year- 156,681
Estimated number of basketball-related cases that same year- 653,676
Estimated number of football-related cases that same year- 363,921
Estimated number of swimming pool-related cases that same year- 72,933
Estimated number of trampoline-related cases that same year- 83,399
source: National Electronic Injury Surveillance System; based on emergency room visit reports
Also, recent legislation changed the way some states now view skateboarding. As of January 1, 1998 the California State Assembly Bill AB1296 was enacted as law. Basically this bill adds skateboarding to the list of Hazardous Recreational Activities (HRA’s) along with such sports as kayaking, mountain biking, skydiving, hang-gliding, and others. The bill basically states that: “skateboarding at a public skatepark is a HRA” if the person “is 14 years of age or older, the park is on public property, and the skating was stunt, trick, or luge.” As such, “neither public entities nor public employees are liable to any person who participates in a HRA.” Also, most existing laws insist that all skaters wear the appropriate protective gear (helmet, knee and elbow pads) and that signs stating the risks are posted. In layman’s terms this means that a city cannot be sued by someone injured in a public skatepark as long as all the above conditions are met. This takes the pressure off the local government’s liability and makes a skatepark more feasible. A similar amendment could be adopted in Pennsyvania with some support and letter writing.
Just some more food for thought on this long standing debate and issue for Stewartstown. Just to reiterate, with our town growing so much, and more and more youth in town, it would be nice if the skaters had a controlled environment in order to skate peacefully.
Crawdaddy