Chief, I just read this article in the YDR. I know you have been involved in conversations with Fawn Borough about expanding police coverage or starting their own force. What is your opinion on this article? Should folks push for local enforcement with thier township councils or is the rate being charged by the state fair. I thought that state police were included in the taxes that we already pay to the state, but that is not a fight I am ready to fight. They just keep digging and digging into our pockets, and we have no say. I look forward to seeing your thoughts. I am amazed by the last line of the article below that discusses the fees going to pay for highways and bridges too. That just tells me it is another tax on rural folks to pay for city projects.
Pennsylvania municipalities without full-time police forces would have to pay for the state troopers who patrol their streets under a bill that a state House committee narrowly passed this week.
Under the proposal, those municipalities would eventually be charged $156 per resident—or lesser amounts if they maintain their own part-time police coverage.
York County municipalities that rely on state police for some or all of their coverage include Chanceford Township, Codorus Township, Delta, East Hopewell Township, Fawn Township, Hopewell Township, Jefferson, Loganville, Lower Chanceford Township, North Hopewell Township (part-time coverage), Peach Bottom Township, Shrewsbury Township, Springfield Township, Stewartstown (part-time coverage), Warrington Township, Washington Township, Wellsville and Wrightsville (part-time coverage).
The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Mike Sturla, D-Lancaster, said it would generate about $450 million annually to help pay for state police operations, new state police cadets, equipment, cooperative police pacts, and to maintain Pennsylvania’s highways and bridges.